Home > Papers from 2012 > The role of individual experience in cue-weighting

The role of individual experience in cue-weighting

One of the most interesting current questions in insect navigation concerns how different navigational modalities interact. There are important debates to be had about the necessary ‘cognitive’ mechanisms for cue integration and also how environmental and species differences change the optimal balance of cue use. We do know that different species ‘trust’ path integration to different degrees, and that this varies as a function of the visual clutter in their environment. Here, Cheng et al. utilise a valuable natural resource to investigate differences between ants from the same species that happen to live in different visual ecologies. Melophorus normally live in visually-cluttered environments, however a balloon field near Alice Springs means that a rare colony can be found in an open area. Ants from this nest and a ‘normal’ nest were tested to see how much of their Path Integrated home vector they would run off before switching to a visually-guided search. Ants from the cluttered environment switched more readily, suggesting that their experience of cluttered environment was influencing their ‘trust’ in PI.

Ken Cheng, Eliza J. T. Middleton, and Rüdiger Wehner (2012) Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants of the same species inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments. J Exp Biol 2012;215 3169-3174

Categories: Papers from 2012
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s