Home > Papers from 2012 > The perils of comparative cognition

The perils of comparative cognition

This is another paper taken from the Animal Minds Phil Trans special issue. The article builds on ideas in the paper by Doring and Chittka [http://wp.me/pFSBM-7h] and discusses in general terms the problems of comparing cognitive abilities between species. The paper gives a very readable account of why we should fear top-down approaches and be wary of gross comparisons of neuroanatomy, but isn’t all negative. There are positive promotions of bottom-up evolutionary explanations as well as minimal cognitivve modelling and data-driven approaches, all of which may prove fruitful

Lars Chittka, Stephen J. Rossiter, Peter Skorupski, and Chrisantha Fernando (2012) What is comparable in comparative cognition? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367 2677-2685; doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0215

Categories: Papers from 2012
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s