Predicting ants
Familiarity for UAVs
In recent years the idea that visual route navigation might be implemented by agents making simple familiarity judgements has become popular. It allows for navigation with a simple unstructured visual memory that could be implemented in the mushroom body of an insect. Given the simplicity of the idea it was inevitable that it would be tested in UAV platforms. This paper reports tentatively successful trials of such an algorithm.
van Dalen, G. J., McGuire, K. N., & de Croon, G. C. (2016) Visual Homing for Micro Aerial Vehicles using Scene Familiarity. Proceedings International Micro Air Vehicles, Conferences and Competitions 2016.
Rapid landscape learning in bees
We all know that bees have specific flight patterns that are undertaken at the beginning of their foraging careers. Our understanding of these so-called learning flights has been massively advanced in recent years by the use of harmonic radar to track bees. This has allowed us to understand how the flights develop and how they are influenced by the structure of the environment. In this new paper, we get another insight into these learning flights. Bees are tracked for one flight only and then tested by being released within the extent of the learning flight or in a novel area. The results show that bees are capable of one-trial learning.
Insect-inspired visual sensors
Obviously we know that insects, such as ants, are expert visual navigators but we have a limited understanding of how (if at all) the sensory physiology of ants is tuned to navigation. One approach to that question is to investigate how differently tuned sensors would perform at a navigational task, such as identifying stable environmental features. Many ants have UV and green photoreceptors which led to the suggestion that a UV-green contrast might be a good way to identify environmental features in the world. Here, Differt and Möller show that actually using the UV channel alone can be very useful for navigation, when the UV signal is simply thresholded useful a locally adaptive threshold. This is an interesting approach to thinking about sensor physiology, but also useful for designing sensors for navigating agents.
Navigational toolkit in action
“Ants use multiple cues for navigating to a food source or nest location. Directional information is derived from pheromone trails or visual landmarks or celestial objects. Some ants use the celestial compass information along with an ‘odometer’ to determine the shortest distance home, a strategy known as path integration. Some trail-following ants utilise visual landmark information whereas few of the solitary-foraging ants rely on both path integration and visual landmark information. However, it is unknown to what degree trail-following ants use path integration and we investigated this in a trunk-trail-following ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus. Trunk-trail ants connect their nests to food sites with pheromone trails that contain long-lasting orientation information. We determined the use of visual landmarks and the ability to path integrate in a trunk-trail forming ant. We found that experienced animals switch to relying on visual landmark information, and naïve individuals rely on odour trails. Ants displaced to unfamiliar locations relied on path integration, but, surprisingly, they did not travel the entire homebound distance. We found that as the homebound distance increased, the distance ants travelled relying on the path integrator reduced.”
Making your own way home
Pfeffer, S. E. & Wittlinger, M. 2016 Optic flow odometry operates independently of stride integration in carried ants. Science 353, 1155-1157.
Lifelong radar tracking
This paper almost slipped by without notice, which would have been a real shame because it is technically stunning and shows what might be possible in future navigation studies. Woodgate et al have been able to track the entire foraging history of individual bumblebees. They find that individuals vary in the ratio of exploration to exploitation in their flights. Of course this is interesting from a behavioural ecology perspective and the way in which a colony uses their environment. It is also very interesting in terms of navigation and the potential for some bees to have widespread knowledge of the environment, whereas others may restrict themselves to route like corridors.
Traplining in honeybees
Trapline foraging is observed in many insects, whereby an individual visits a series of locations in a repeatable and consistent order. As a natural behaviour this has been observed in solitary bees visiting sequences of orchids and in parasitic wasps monitoring a series of potential hosts. Experimentally, traplining has been well studied in bumblebees whose foragers are solitary. In this paper, it is shown that honeybee foragers also develop trapline routes in experimental situations, which is interesting for a species with social recruitment. That traplining seems to be a general emergent property of routes visiting multiple locations, reinforces the prevailing idea that the major navigation mode for insect is the development and maintainance of habitual idiosyncratic routes.
Making sense of complex scenes